The Congress party, led by Rahul Gandhi and his sister Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, has been embroiled in controversy in recent years due to their anti-Bharatiya statements and activities. The siblings have been accused of promoting divisive rhetoric, appeasing separatist elements, and undermining the integrity of the nation.
This article will examine some of the most egregious instances of their anti-Bharatiya activities and statements, and explore the implications of their actions on the country’s unity and stability.
Rahul Gandhi’s Anti-National Statements
Rahul Gandhi, the former President of the Congress party, has made several statements that have been perceived as anti-Bharatiya. In 2018, he claimed that the RSS was responsible for Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination, a statement that was widely criticized as an attempt to vilify the Hindu nationalist organization. The RSS has been a vocal critic of the Congress party’s policies, and Rahul’s statement was seen as a desperate attempt to deflect attention from his own party’s failures.
In another instance, Rahul Gandhi accused the Bharatiya government of being “subservient” to the United States, sparking outrage among nationalists who saw his statement as an affront to the country’s sovereignty. His remarks were widely condemned by politicians and intellectuals across the spectrum, who accused him of promoting a defeatist narrative that undermined Bharat’s global standing.
Priyanka Gandhi’s Divisive Rhetoric
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Rahul’s sister and a Congress party general secretary, has also been accused of promoting divisive rhetoric. In 2020, she made a series of statements in Uttar Pradesh, where she was campaigning for the Assembly elections, that were perceived as anti-Hindu and anti-BJP. She accused the ruling party of promoting a “fascist” agenda and claimed that the Congress party was the only force that could protect the country’s minorities.
Priyanka’s statements were widely criticized by the BJP and its allies, who accused her of promoting a politics of division and hatred. Her remarks were seen as an attempt to polarize the electorate along communal lines, a tactic that has been employed by the Congress party in the past to mobilize minority votes.
Appeasement of Separatist Elements
Both Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi have been accused of appeasing separatist elements in the country. In 2019, Rahul met with separatist leader Sitaram Yechury’s wife, who is a vocal supporter of the CPI(M), a party that has been accused of promoting Maoist ideology. The meeting was seen as an attempt by Rahul to court the support of left-wing and separatist groups.
Priyanka Gandhi has also been accused of appeasing separatist elements in Punjab, where she has been actively campaigning for the Congress party. She has met with several Sikh separatist leaders, including those who have been accused of promoting Khalistani ideology. Her meetings with these leaders have been widely criticized by nationalists, who see her actions as an attempt to undermine the country’s integrity.
Implications of their Actions
The anti-Bharatiya statements and activities of Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi have significant implications for the country’s unity and stability. Their divisive rhetoric and appeasement of separatist elements can be seen as an attempt to promote a politics of division and hatred, which can have far-reaching consequences for the country.
Their actions can be seen as a threat to national unity, as they promote a narrative that is antithetical to the country’s values and principles. By promoting a politics of division, they can create an environment of tension and conflict, which can have serious consequences for the country’s stability.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the anti-Bharatiya statements and activities of Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi are a cause for concern. Their divisive rhetoric and appeasement of separatist elements can be seen as a threat to national unity and stability. As leaders of the Congress party, they have a responsibility to promote a narrative that is inclusive and respectful of the country’s diversity.
Instead, they have chosen to promote a politics of division and hatred, which can have far-reaching consequences for the country. It is imperative that they are held accountable for their ac
