28.1 C
New Delhi
Tuesday, June 15, 2021

Republic Exposes the BIGGEST U-Turn by AIIMS Forensic Head Sudhir Gupta

Must read

It seems the Sushant Singh Rajput death case has been getting more complex with each passing day. For the last couple of days, several media outlets have quoted AIIMS Forensic Department head Dr. Sudhir Gupta, who has unofficially claimed that “Sushant’s death is a case of suicide and the murder angle has been completely ruled out.” 

The panel of AIIMS doctors was re-evaluating the post-mortem and viscera reports of Sushant Rajput, based on the 20% viscera sample available with them. However, there has not been an official statement either from the AIIMS or the CBI which has the report submitted to them by the AIIMS. Now, in light of this, Dr. Sudhir Gupta’s complete u-turn – the biggest flip-flop in the Sushant Singh Rajput death case, has been exposed in Republic Media Network’s.

Dr Sudhir Gupta’s complete flip-flop exposed

Republic Media Network has exposed this entire conspiracy and aired a credible proof which shreds the lies in the case of the late actor’s death and will silence the ‘suicide theorists’. On August 22, just a day after the AIIMS panel was formed on the recommendation of the CBI, Dr. Sudhir Gupta who was the head of the panel had raised several questions on the Cooper Hospital’s report and had questioned the Mumbai Police in a conversation with Republic’s Editor Special Projects Prakash Singh.

In Republic’s expose, Dr. Sudhir Gupta had made it clear that the “crime scene has not been kept intact” and also alleged there was “contamination of evidence”. It is quite shocking that why Dr. Sudhir Gupta has made a complete 180-degree U-turn and allegedly submitted a ‘conclusive findings’ in the forensic report.

Dr. Gupta’s sensational revelations from August 22 completely contradict his views now. HE clearly said that “Why was the autopsy done in such a hurry, was any videography done? There was contamination of evidence and is not suitable for further examination with sanctity.” Here it is important to know that it was Sudhir Gupta who never given permission to open Sunanda Pushkar’s room for four years.

Republic Media Network also possesses the Whatsapp Chats with Dr Sudhir Gupta, from August 11, wherein Dr. Gupta raised some serious questions on forensics. “The panel of five doctors of Cooper conducted autopsy…only one is junior level forensic doctor…rest 4 are just medical officer. The panel must be of forensic specialist as per norms. Who constituted the medical board? What was justification for the medical board…by the police?”. These questions validate that Sudhir Gupta was not convinced by the forensic done by the Cooper Hospital staff, but now he has taken a complete U-Turn.

These evidences clearly exposed a summersault by Dr. Sudhir Gupta and raised questions over the manner in which things were done by the Mumbai Police and the Cooper hospital. It also openly questioned the manner in which the autopsy was conducted. In effect, in the video as well, he had ruled that what had been provided was insufficient for conducting an examination that would later allegedly yield ‘conclusive findings’ and a ‘100%’ result.

Its a death by strangulation’: AIIMS doctor to Sushant’s family

The CBI had questioned the doctors at Mumbai’s Cooper Hospital and reexamined the autopsy reports of Sushant Singh Rajput. As per the CBI, the autopsy report was allegedly ‘botched’ up and the report was ‘misleading’. The CBI had raised suspicions on why vital details like the time of death had been skipped in the report. The CBI team had also quizzed the Mumbai police why a second opinion was not taken on the autopsy report released by Cooper hospital during the investigation.

Sudhant’s Family’s Lawyer Vikas Singh exposed the lie of AIIMS doctors.

Sushant Singh Rajput’s family lawyer Vikas Singh also expressed his ‘frustration’ with the CBI and the way this entire probing is going on. Vikas Singh claimed that the CBI was ‘delaying’ the conversion of the case from abetment to suicide to murder. He further added that an AIIMS Doctor who is working on the forensic report of the Sushant Rajput case had told him, on the basis of the photos of his mortal remains, had confirmed that SSR’s death was certainly ’caused by strangulation.’ 

Full text of the conversation between Dr. Sudhir Gupta & Prakash Singh: Source Republic

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: I will have a look at it and also the loopholes in the autopsy report. Firstly, why was the autopsy done in such a hurry? Then, was any videography done? 

Prakash Singh: The crime scene was not protected as well. 

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: That was a destruction of evidence. 

Prakash Singh: Yes.

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: I had never given permission to open the room of Sunanda Pushkar for 4 years. 

Prakash Singh: Yes

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: After that, there had been a case of D.K. Ravi, IAS in Bangalore. 

Prakash Singh: Yes, Yes.

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: So I have clarified that…

Prakash Singh: Okay, please tell me…

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: The chairman of the medical board…

Prakash singh: Sir, let me write down.
——————————————–

‘Crime scene has been contaminated’

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: The crime scene is investigated by the forensic…

Prakash Singh: Yes.

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: That has been done. I mean, that must have been done. So that report also. 

Prakash Singh: so, which has been prepared of the crime scene, right? 

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: yes, crime scene. And you can also add that, it’s a surprise to see that the crime scene has not been kept intact. It has been contaminated. 

Prakash Singh: AIIMS board is surprised to observe that the crime scene…

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: Was not kept intact. We cannot call it destruction. So, it has been contaminated and is not suitable for further examination with sanctity. 

Prakash Singh: It was contaminated. 

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: and not forensically suitable for further…

Prakash Singh: and forensically?

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: not suitable for examination for credible forensic evidences. 
——————————————–

‘He was taken directly to the mortuarty’

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: There is a rule of investigation. The police involved primarily, are not the final investigators. There is the Sessions court and the High Court after that. Then there is the Supreme Court. We can take the judgement of the Supreme Court as final. When a primary state police knows that there is any dispute and contest in demand, the High Court or state government can transfer it to a higher agency. So, till the time the case is not pulled down and settled by the judiciary, they have to keep all the evidences and places from where the body has been recovered intact. The closure can be opened only with the approval of the judiciary. Like in the case of Sunanda Pushkar…

Prakash Singh: When had the CBI written to the AIIMS board?

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: They have written to us yesterday. 

Prakash Singh: Yesterday, which is the 21st?

Dr. Sudhir Gupta: 21.08.2020.

Prakash Singh: And examination of everything? 

Dr Sudhir Gupta: It’s written…It’s, therefore, requested that a medical board of doctors of AIIMS in Delhi may please be constituted and deputed for visiting the place of occurrence in Mumbai at the earliest. Necessary medical papers related to the death of SSR will be sent shortly… So we are waiting for them. After that, we will analyze it, find the loopholes…Why did they not mention time of death. The criteria is…He was declared dead in the flat only. He was taken directly to the mortuary, not in emergency. So how did they presume, he is dead, that requires an emergency medical revival situation. So it was that it’s death at that time…After that, the timing of doing the autopsy is fixed.

Article Source – Republic News Network

SourceRepublic

Disclaimer The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carry the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The opinions, facts and any media content in them are presented solely by the authors, and neither Trunicle.com nor its partners assume any responsibility for them. Please contact us in case of abuse at Trunicle[At]gmail.com

- Advertisement -

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest article